Love this in the Instructions for Authors of the Taylor and Francis academic journal, Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems: 'Mounting evidence that GenAI not only generates inaccurate results (so-called “hallucinations”) but also tends to de-skill labor and undermine cognitive work necessary for learning makes it an inappropriate tool for research, writing, and reviewing. As an agroecology journal, we are also concerned with GenAI’s burgeoning water and energy demands, reliance on exploited data labor, and embedded racial bias'
Very worrying, but I doubt the AI evangelists will take any notice.
Too true... where gender is concerned its always been a long walk to freedom.
Love this in the Instructions for Authors of the Taylor and Francis academic journal, Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems: 'Mounting evidence that GenAI not only generates inaccurate results (so-called “hallucinations”) but also tends to de-skill labor and undermine cognitive work necessary for learning makes it an inappropriate tool for research, writing, and reviewing. As an agroecology journal, we are also concerned with GenAI’s burgeoning water and energy demands, reliance on exploited data labor, and embedded racial bias'
Is this the pot calling the kettle black!